Tuck Everlasting - Natalie Babbitt - ★.½

AUTHOR: Natalie Babbitt
GENRE: Middle-grade Fiction, Classic
PUBLICATION DATE: 1975
RATING: 1.5 stars.
In a Nutshell: How in the world is this a children’s classic and recommended reading in schools? π€
I finally got the chance to read this popular classic. While a part of me sees the appeal of the concept – a family that lives forever, I couldn’t find myself impressed with the storytelling or the characters.
The plot is too focussed on specifying the whats without any of the whys. This leads to a telling-dominated narrative which irks after a while. The characters also appear flat because of this. There are a few plot holes as well, the biggest one connected to how our narrator ends up with the Tucks.
Further, this book has a child kidnapping (leading to Stockholm Syndrome), a stalker, a murder occurring on page, imprisonment, and abetment of a prisoner’s escape – not exactly what I expected in a MG/YA book.
Worst of all: I didn’t expect our ten-year-old lead character to express instant attraction to a seventeen-year-old boy, and the boy actually hoping they would get together in a few years – that’s just icky!
The potential exploration of the moral quandary of living forever versus experiencing life to the fullest the way it is meant to be showed promise, but this isn't really fulfilled by the book as it leaves young readers to do all the heavy thinking and filling-in of the plot gaps by themselves. The descriptions of the 1880s setting are lush.
I found the ending okay. I had been quite worried that it would proceed a certain creepy way, but it doesn’t. Though it still doesn’t offer much closure regarding all the characters, I liked that one character got the life they deserved. And I don’t mean the toad.
The 50th Anniversary Edition contains a foreword by Gabrielle Zevin; this is quite interesting, but it has a couple of spoilers. Better if this is read after you complete the story.
Would I have been more impressed with this book if I had read it as a child? I doubt it. The lack of clear answers would have frustrated me even then, though not as much as current-me was bothered by the inappropriate *romance*.
Basically, I don’t see why this is a beloved children’s classic or why it is recommended reading in schools. π€·π»♀️


Comments
Post a Comment